Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I'm not surprised, having read this article a while back: http://www.ars-technica.com/cpu/3q99/athlon/athlon-7.html I think I paid at least another $300 for those 10 seconds, but I wanted a bleeding edge Athlon and TNT video card, not two Celerons. Now I am thinking of getting yet another computer, and dual PIIs or Celerons may be the way I'll go. But your results are a case in point--a real OS runs well on real hardware, and runs like a dog on antique hardware. Linux is no different, except unlike some OS'es it will actually run on a 386. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Martin" <dmartin at ne.arris-i.com> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Scott Stirling wrote: > > > Hee, hee. I run Linux on my Athlon 700, 196 MB SDRAM, 13 GB 7200 RPM IDE > > drive and it takes me 2min 25sec (tops) to compile the 2.2.13 kernel with > > standard config options. I know people love to extend the lives of boat > > anchors with Linux, but it's such a sweet OS to have on a kick-ass computer! > > Pissing contest, eh? I have a dual celeron 400 that compiles the kernel > in 2 min, 35 seconds, and only cost me $300 for the board and both CPUs. > How much extra did you pay for those 10 seconds? EH? > > hehehe :) - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |