![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Frank J. Ramsay wrote: > /var/logs/messsages says "marsdome lpd: lpd loaded successfully" and the > date/time stamp is correct for the last boot. Meaningless. All that tells you is the lpd daemon started. It doesn't care wether or not you have an lp port. If you have a printer defined to use it but it isn't there, it just won't print. I think you said this was a redhat system. You can look at the output to the `dmesg' command, or if your system's been up for a while you'll probably want to look at /var/log/dmesg on a redhat system. Nothing at all, or nothing about lp? If the latter, then you definitely don't have support in your kernel. So don't bother with the stuff above... > I tried just doing an insmod for the paraport_pc.o, paraport_probe.o, and lp.o > in /lib/modules/2.2.5-15/misc but that didn't seem to help... I would have thought that would work, or specifically insmod lp but if that didn't do it, I'd suggest recompiling your kernel. Did you get error messages when you tried it? If you did an lsmod after, did it show up? Do you see any lp mentioned in /proc/devices after trying that? If you don't see anything, try compiling the support directly into the kernel. -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" "Who watches the watchmen?" -Juvenal, Satires, VI, 347 Derek D. Martin | Senior UNIX Systems/Network Administrator Arris Interactive | A Nortel Company derekm at mediaone.net | dmartin at ne.arris-i.com ------------------------------------------------- - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |