Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000, Udaya Krishna wrote: > > Hi, > > Can anyone explain me the difference in detail between telnet > and rlogin. I am quite confused with both these terms. Telnet is a little bit insecure and rsh/rlogin is a LOT insecure. Both will transmit your password in cleartext if you give it one. rlogin gives you the ability to log in remotely without supplying a password, but this can easily be spoofed and is a Bad Thing(TM) in general, though on a secure, trusted network can be acceptable. Problem being that there is no such thing as a secure, trusted network that's connected to the outside world in any way. > From what I know, rlogin can be used only on unix and telnet can > be used on any system. But, how these two programs differ from > each other ? The best answer someone could give you here is "read the man pages." If you aren't already, you should get in the habit of reading the man pages, since (except on Sun Solaris pre-2.7 machines -- UGH) the man pages have the most complete and detailed information about all of the commands on your system. There are also implementation-dependent differences for all commands from operating system to operating system (i.e. Linux's rsh may have different options from that of Irix's rsh, etc.). The only way to find out about these differences is to read the man pages. All that said, just download ssh and use that instead. It's much more secure (or can be -- you can make it fairly insecure if you try hard) and a lot more featureful/flexible than either telnet or rlogin/rsh. On a final note, it isn't necessarily true that you can't use rlogin on non-Unix platforms... it just so happens that most other platforms don't provide rlogin. In theory, you could write an rlogin client for any system that supports TCP/IP networking, though the implementation might be a little non-standard on some OSes that are not designed to be multi-user systems (like MS-DOS). -- "Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" "Who watches the watchmen?" -Juvenal, Satires, VI, 347 Derek D. Martin | Senior UNIX Systems/Network Administrator Arris Interactive | A Nortel Company derekm at mediaone.net | dmartin at ne.arris-i.com ------------------------------------------------- - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |