Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Nor Tru64. On older Unix systems, the ls command used to be hard linked to and ll, lf, and la such that when invoked with the ll command, ls would assume the ls -l properties, ls -f and ls -al respectively. If my memory serves me correctly aliases where first instroduced into the C Shell which obviated the need. On Most Unix systems this technique is done with the vi command which is linked to ex and view. Also note that the -i option gives you the inode number. Scott Lanning wrote: > On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Allan Sherman wrote: > > "ls -l" OR "ls -al" > > > >(the "a" includes hidden files) > > > >In Unix, I just use "ll" but that is apparently not a standard > >alias in Linux. > > FYI, it's not on the Irix or AIX machines I have access to, > either. > > - > Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with > "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the > message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored). > -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |