Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hi guys, Iam planning to install a new server with RHL, to replace a buggy 5.1 server. Would like to have any suggestions in hardware/RHL version selection. AFAIK, part from the piranha bug (which anyway doesnt get installed by default), is 6.2 stable enough for a production server which will have 24X7 activity as ftp/web/dns server? Iam surprised that my good old slackware server has uptime of more than a year now and not given any troubles recently, whereas RHL does give one problem or other - maybe newer versions are better. This brings to my mind what I read somewhere - that RH adds unstable kernel patches to their releases and thats the reason for some of their versions giving trouble. Re hardware, I (like anybody else) have faced problems with newer NICs as well as display cards and had to get the latest drivers to get things running. Does 6.2 support most hardware out of the box? I dont mind doing all the download/compile etc, but doesnt want to waste time if there is a better alternative. Also, is there a list of hardware that are likely to give trouble (I can look in the howtos, but thought of a quick feedback). Does Linux (really) support UDMA/66 ? - TIA Oommen - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |