BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

mysql viability (was: shells and bells)

Subject: mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
From: mikebw at colossus.bilow.com (Mike Bilow)
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 17:22:22 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005041447330.5305-100000@martin.mclinux.com>

On 2000-05-04 at 14:53 -0400, Derek Martin wrote:

> On Thu, 4 May 2000, Mike Bilow wrote:
> 
> > tree-structured database, but all modern filesystems (except, maybe, FAT)
> 
> Who said FAT was a modern file system?

It's in Windows 2000 and Linux...

Don't look at me: I still use HPFS.

-- Mike

-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).

Follow-Ups:
- mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
  - From: niall at kst.com (Niall Kavanagh)

References:
- mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
  - From: ddm at mclinux.com (Derek Martin)

Prev by Date: mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
Next by Date: mysql locking and backups
Previous by thread: mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
Next by thread: mysql viability (was: shells and bells)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread


BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities.

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org