Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hello all, Have been having problems getting ethernet up and running on my old Gateway p5-60. It's running RH6.2 (installed as a plain vanilla "server" following the options presented in the install procedure, so no X-windows except for the font server etc.) The machine is intended to be a gateway (no pun intended <G>) for a small network of mostly Windows boxes with one or two macs and eventually one or two Linuxen. The NIC is a Netgear FA310TX 10/100. Last Saturday a friend was over with his Dell laptop running NT4. At that time he could ping just fine over a crossover cable to this linux box but the return ping from the RH6.2 box to the laptop didn't work. Well more precisely, it would sort of work, if I added the -f i.e. "ping -f -c4 ....." (the man page for ping in RH6.2 says that -f is for "flooding" the connection.... haven't noticed this option before but never looked for it either....) Not being entirely too sure of the quality of that crossover cable, today I tried to look at it again. Here is output from ifconfig and several pings that I thought might characterize the problem. If anything else might help, I'll try to get that too. (Note that now it is connected to a Netgear DS108 hub but I can't ping the other machines on the hub either - one NT4SP4 and one W2K all with set local IP addresses 192.168.1.---- Note that the WinDoze boxes also have problems of their own recognizing each other and the Gateway, but that is for another list, I guess. <G>) 1.) ifconfig yields eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:5B:B3:60 inet addr:192.168.1.250 Bcast:192.168.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:687 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1 TX packets:1276 errors:61604 dropped:0 overruns:1 carrier:122577 collisions:1719 txqueuelen:100 Interrupt:9 Base address:0xfc00 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:3924 Metric:1 RX packets:62456 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:62456 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 --- clearly from the the IP 192.168.1.250 is having major problems..... but the local loop is getting many errors also??? 2.) Pinging to the local loop yields a good result --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.3/0.4/0.8 ms 3.) a straight ping -c4 192.168.1.250 gives (I chose to get only 4 returns (like the NT ping does) else it just continues indefinitely.) --- 192.168.1.250 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 75% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.8/0.8/0.8 ms PING 192.168.1.250 (192.168.1.250) from 192.168.1.250 : 56(84) bytes of data. 4.) but if I do a ping -c4 -f .... I get --- 192.168.1.250 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.3/0.4/0.9 ms PING 192.168.1.250 (192.168.1.250) from 192.168.1.250 : 56(84) bytes of data. and no difference if I add in a -d it gives the same Note that the "flood" param seems to work ok but am not sure what it is doing differently... So my question is what have I done wrong/ left out of my set up. Clearly something is not working right.... TIA for any help ... Regards Henry Dr. Henry J. P. Smith TPE Associates "Technology Physics Environment" - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |