Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have real problems with Microsoft's dominance. I resent being unable to buy a computer from a major brand-name vendor without Windows. I resent having the computer arrive with video cards that will never be documented so that they can be supported on anything other than Windows, or -- worse -- "winmodems" and "winprinters" where Windows is actually necessary for their most basic operation. We spend a lot of time dealing with the fallout from Microsoft's poor networking implementations. For example, when our Unix mail server fails a message, it does so properly and sends a polite English language explanation of what went wrong -- which Microsoft mail clients throw away. Instead of the intelligent error message we generate, such as "Addressee unknown" or "Too many '@' characters," users of Microsoft mail software are shown a dialog box that says something like "There is a problem with your mail server." What is insidious about this is that they are putting the blame on us! We see just about everything in the logs. We had someone a few weeks ago sending mail to -- I am not making this up -- "[required e-mail address]." We rejected this with a message like "You must have at least one '@' character in the recipient address," but Microsoft Outlook dutifully reported "There is a problem with your mail server." We once had someone sending mail who had typed their STREET address, complete with city, state, and ZIP code, into the "address" field of their mail program. In desperation, we looked up their telephone number from their street address and called them by voice. At least half of technical support volume is this sort of stupidity, such as failure to reflect a simple error message to the user. MSIE also makes up its own "friendly" web error messages by default, suppressing any custom web page we generate to try to help the user. Why does Microsoft do this? Is it just a penchant for sabotage? -- Mike On 2000-05-15 at 19:07 -0400, David P. Greenberg wrote: > Is it just me, or does it seem that all this Linux vs. Microsoft stuff is a > little ridiculous? I love Linux, which I am still pretty much a newbie with, > but I also enjoy Win95, Win3x and Dos. I kind of feel like that guy who got > beat up by those LA cops, Rodney King when I say "Can't we all just get > along?" Does it in any way make Linux a stronger OS to be constantly > decrying Microsoft. - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |