Star Office 5.2 [was Re: Plea for help]

[smith at missioncriticallinux.com (Jeffry Smith)]

When I saw it on the GNOME web site, it was a "we want to do for
gnome what KLyx does for KDE)", no actual code yet.  However, the
only problem I have with Lyx is XForms (which is non-free).  A GTK
front end would be great for me (I know I could do raw TeX/LaTeX,
but I'm not that proficient).  I've used KLyx some, but have had
problems on my SMP machine at home (works fine on all the UP
machiens I've used)

jeff
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Derek Martin wrote:

> Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 13:53:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Derek Martin <ddm at mclinux.com>
> To: Jeffry Smith <smith at missioncriticallinux.com>
> Cc: Paul Lussier <pll at mclinux.com>, Jonathan Arnold <jdarnold at buddydog.org>,
     GNHLUG <gnhlug at zk3.dec.com>, BLU Users' Group <discuss at blu.org>
> Subject: Re: Star Office 5.2 [was Re: Plea for help] 
> 
> On Tue, 16 May 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
> 
> > (Lyx/KLyx/GtkLyx [see sourceforge]) system would be better, but MS
> 
> As Scooby Doo would say, "ruh?"  GtkLyx?  I've got to check it out.  Is it
> further along than kLyx?  Lots of stuff broken or missing in kLyx from
> what I've seen...
> 
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffry Smith      Technical Sales Consultant     Mission Critical Linux
smith at missioncriticallinux.com phone:978.446.9166,x271 fax:978.446.9470
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought for today:  Between infinite and short there is a big difference.
		-- G.H. Gonnet


-
Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with
"subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the
message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).