Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Tue, 1 Aug 2000, Karl J. Runge wrote: > > Do you know if it will be 100% compatible with existing RH installations? > (i.e. no tweaking required to get things working again after an upgrade. > I believe RH could achieve this in a number of ways) > > But if not, then let us now have a moment of silence for those of us who > will be broken......... > > ;-) The way I heard it explained, the 7.x indicates changes in the compiler that are not backward compatible. Throughout the 6.x series they stuck with an old egcs and didn't keep up with glibc updates, in order to enable, for example, binaries built on 6.2 to run on older 6.x systems. With 7.0, they're upgrading to the current gcc and current glibc, and binaries built with these won't run on 6.x systems. Presumably 6.x binaries will run okay on 7.0, probably requiring a "compatibility" rpm containing the older versions of the libraries. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix Email: jabr at blu.org / URL: http://www.blu.org ICQ#28611923 / AIM abreauj ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Working with NT is like trying to tune a watch wearing oven mitts. You can't get your fingers inside like you can with UNIX. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |