![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
hi all, I've started to play with rcs and I'm having problems with branches. the man pages don't seem to have the address my problem so I'm going to ask here. >From my reading it doesn't seem that rcs has proper branches, but the revision functionality seems like it should do what I need. if I check out version 1.1 of a file, make changes, and check it in with ci -r2 <file> it checks in as version 2.1 which is fine. The problem is, if I again check out version 1.1 of the file (co -r1 -l <file>) when I make changes it won't let it is as version 1.2 (ie ci -r1.2 <file>) it complains saying: revision 1.2 too low; must be higher than 2.1 even if I set the working revision to 1 (rcs -b1 <file>) I can't get it to save the file as revision 1.2. Am I missing something or does rcs not allow you to have concurent development on different branches of code? maybe I'm just spoiled by clearcase. -fjr -- Frank Ramsay fjr at marsdome.penguinpowered.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |