Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Mon, 11 Dec 2000, Randall Hofland wrote: > It appears that Micro$oft has developed a new and potentially very > profitable business model as described at theregister: > > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/15337.html > I'm not sure how this is a business model? Microsoft hasn't made any noises about licensing these advisories -- have they? To be sure, it's pretty lame. Wouldn't the context of posting such an advisory (like on SecFocus, where it also has examples, brief explanations, etc) be covered under "fair use", regardless of the copyright? Pretty silly, considering most folks usually go to the source (which in these cases would be Microsoft's own advisories) anyway to get the full scoop. All they're doing is pissing people off. > Unfortunately, it will do little to encourage anyone at Micro$oft to fix > their record of software bugs but it may serve to replace the lost > revenue that Linux seems to be inflicting. If I were Microsoft I'd spend less time worrying about Linux and more time worrying about what Sun is doing. -- Niall Kavanagh, niall at kst.com News, articles, and resources for web professionals and developers: http://www.kst.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |