Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Hi: I've come to the point on my PC at home where I want to upgrade the Linux kernel in the hopes it will help me get my ethernet card recognized by the tulip driver. There have been suggestions to the effect that 2.2 has a problem but 2.4 has worked pretty well. So be it- that's what upgrades are for! Now the question I wanted to throw out there is this: how do you all feel about mixing installations? I have SuSE 6.3 installed right now which makes my kernel 2.2.13 or 2.2.14 (can't remember offhand). I was thinking of moving up to SuSE 7.0 but I think it may still be kernel 2.2.x; I can't find that info on their website. RedHat version 7 is currently only 2.2.16. So right now it looks like at least a couple of the big name installations are 2.2.x. My PC doesn't have anything vital on it right now so I could try to install a 2.4 kernel and modules in the existing environment. Any thoughts? Are kernels in a major revision (eg 2.4 vs. 2.2) supposed to be backward compatible with older versions? How about X11? Right now I want to do the minimum that will get my ethernet card recognized and then I can work on upgrading other parts of the system using my DSL connection. (By the way, I've been very satisfied in my first month with Galaxy DSL, albeit on Win 98.) I'm not looking for guarantees, just a feel for what the history of Linux has shown in terms of updates. Best Regards, Nick Oleksinski - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |