|  | Home
 | Calendar
 | Mail Lists
 | List Archives
 | Desktop SIG
 | Hardware Hacking SIG Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU | 
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Jeffry Smith wrote: > Here's a story on MS's rationale for the outage: > http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16354.html > > Hm. They're changing the DNS configuration, and they didn't have the old > system on standby, ready to take over ASAP if the first fails? Have these > guys EVER worked in a major data center (and yes, it's a rhetorical question)? It's interesting that this should have happened now. I had exactly the same problem where I worked, that finally turned out to be an error in our DNS configuration that was made over a year ago. It never actually caused a problem until last week, and when I asked about it on the mailing lists, I heard from a bunch of people that they had experienced the same kinds of problems just recently. I suspect what we're really seeing here is fallout from the root nameservers being under stress. -- John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix ICQ#28611923 / AIM abreauj / Email jabr at blu.org - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).