Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Aside from the technical merits or lack thereof of Legato (I'm mostly in the "lack thereof" camp, but you've heard it all before), Dave's mail points out another Legatoism that I *really* dislike, their business practices: >Legato said "Sure. You'd have to re-purchase not only the server software >itself, but a 100user 'client pack' for the new server as well. No, you >can't transfer your old one, you'll have to re-purchase. Oh, and you'll >need the licenses for your tape changer as well." To which I'll add another experience, this time with their tech support: "why yes, it's 3pm, but we won't have someone available to call you back until 5pm, and you only have a 9-5 support contract, so we'll be billing you at <megabucks> for this call". It's things like that that make me even more cross than the software simply sucking. I no longer have any operational responsibility for backups, but FWIW, the people I work with that do are extremely happy with ADSM/TSM, and I believe they're pushing several terabytes around with it these days. andrew - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |