Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I don't think the choice of Window environment managers defines a distribution. SuSE also standardizes on KDE. I think what had defined Mandrake was that they were more friendly for a less technical user. On 8 Feb 2001, at 11:48, Anthony J. Gabrielson wrote: > Why is Mandrake still around if Redhat comes with KDE? Wasn't Mandrakes > primary concern KDE? I know I'm missing something - just not sure what. Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |