Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I can answer my own question ("we'll just have to wait and see"), but I'll ask it anyway. What's Red Hat going to do for their next distro? Haven't they kind of put themselves in a difficult position, by releasing 7.0 with gcc 2.96? If they push something out the door to contain the new kernel, which compiler are they going to use? If they use 2.95, they'll be binary incompatible with their own most recent release. If they use 2.96, they'll be pulling the same blunder they did last time. I guess I hope they revert to 2.95. Of course I'd like to see gcc 3.0 soon, but I hope they don't rush it. They look to be closing in on it (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-01/msg00871.html), but I think it would be particularly unfortunate if, say, Red Hat's marketing needs began to drive the resolution of what should be purely technical issues. I'm not saying that this is the case, but I can't help wondering. - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |