Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ron Peterson <ron.peterson at yellowbank.com> writes: > According to who? Sure, that's what MediaOne's marketing department calls > it, but as far as I'm concerned, there's nothing "premium" about a static > IP address. In fact, it would be less work for them to manage than > rolling them. Actually, that's not true. Unless they have a good "plan" in place, they may need to re-subnet the town as more users come online. Remember that your whole town is NOT on one subnet. Generally you are subnetted by fiber node, which can handle several neighborhoods. As the neighborhoods get saturated with users, they need to partition the space, hense a renumbering. No, dynamic addressing is MUCH easier for them in the long run. The stability of your dynamic address is really a factor of how well they planned and how well they stick to that plan. -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |