Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Mark Komarinski <mkomarinski at valinux.com> writes: > Cable modem routers (or any NAT filter) can not forward UDP packets. > There are two solutions: Um, you are HORRIBLY confused. Of course you can forward UDP through a NAT. Otherwise not even DNS would work! There are two main issues with UDP through NAT: 1) protocols that include source/dest port numbers _within_ the protocol (ala Kerberos/Zephyr/etc.) will fail. 2) protocols that require server callbacks (ala AFS) require you to increase the NAT timeout. But besides that, there is no reason UDP cannot flow through NAT (I do it almost every day!) > <security> > you really don't want to be running NFS over the Internet. It's bad. > It's insecure, anyone can read it, blah blah. > </security> This I agree with whole-heartedly. I'd really suggest you look into more secure network file systems. Take a look at www.openafs.org! > -Mark -derek -- Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board (SIPB) URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/ PP-ASEL-IA N1NWH warlord at MIT.EDU PGP key available - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |