Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Derek Atkins said: > IPsec and SSH do as good a job at keeping nosy people out of your > network. The way I would do it for a corporate LAN (and I know of > some companies that do it this way) is to have two networks, a wired > network and a wireless network. Keep the wireless network "outside > the firewall" (note: I disbelieve in firewalls, c.f. my BLU talk > about 5 years ago ;) I'm very curious about the nature of your disbelief in firewalls, and I'm unfamiliar with your talk. It seems to me that perimeter security -- limiting the traffic which can enter your network from unknown and untrusted parties on the outside to only that which is absolutely essential for your business or personal needs -- is an essential part of securing any site. Firewalls are a proven tool to accomplish this goal. I'm unable to imagine a reason why someone would not want to have one, given today's network landscape and the (lack of) ethics rampant amongst a certain subset of the people who hang out there. But I don't want to make it sound like a firewall will make your site impenetrable either; I will take this opportunity to reiterate one of my favorite security mantras: a firewall is not a security panacaea. There is much more to securing your site than installing a firewall, and if you rely solely on a firewall for protection, you're probably going to get yourself compromised some time soon. -- Derek Martin Senior System Administrator Mission Critical Linux martin at MissionCriticalLinux.com - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |