Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
So I've been trying to implement http://www.linuxdocs.org/HOWTOs/DNS-HOWTO.html I updated to the latest bind, bind-devel, and bind-utils. Setting up all the files seemed easy, but I couldn't get the tests working. dig -x 127.0.0.1 worked, but dig anyothermachine.tld does not: [root at kramer /etc]# dig pegasystems.com ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> pegasystems.com ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server default -- 127.0.0.1: Connection timed out So I go to check on the status: [root at kramer /etc]# /sbin/service named status named 8.2.3-REL Sat Jan 27 05:11:05 EST 2001 prospector at porky.devel.redhat.com:/usr/src/bs/BUILD/bind-8.2.3/src/bin/named config (/etc/named.conf) last loaded at age: Tue Oct 2 21:13:45 2001 number of zones allocated: 64 debug level: 0 xfers running: 0 xfers deferred: 0 soa queries in progress: 0 query logging is OFF server is initialising itself It says it is still initializing itself, but it's been running for several minutes. Last symptom, and this might be the kicker. The site mentions a way to get an updated root.hints from a root server. Now the one on the web page wasn't working, so I copied the one off of blu.org. Then I tried their command: [root at kramer /etc]# dig @e.root-servers.net ; <<>> DiG 8.3 <<>> @e.root-servers.net ; (1 server found) ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch ;; res_nsend to server e.root-servers.net 192.203.230.10: Connection refused DOH! I can ping that machine, too, so I know it's reachable. Then I found this in /var/log/messages: Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: starting (/etc/named.conf). named 8.2.3-REL Sat Jan 27 05:11:05 EST 2001 ^Iprospector at porky.devel.redhat.com:/usr/src/bs/BUILD/bind-8.2.3/src/bin/named Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: hint zone "" (IN) loaded (serial 0) Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: master zone "0.0.127.in-addr.arpa" (IN) loaded (serial 1) Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: listening on [127.0.0.1].53 (lo) Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: listening on [65.96.156.60].53 (eth0) Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: listening on [192.168.1.1].53 (eth1) Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4887]: Forwarding source address is [0.0.0.0].53 Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named: named startup succeeded Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4888]: group = 25 Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4888]: user = named Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4888]: Ready to answer queries. Oct 2 21:40:07 kramer named[4888]: sysquery: sendto([192.5.5.241].53): Operation not permitted Oct 2 21:51:34 kramer named[4888]: ns_forw: sendto([192.5.5.241].53): Operation not permitted Operation not permitted? I have port 53 open on my firewall: ipchains -A input -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p udp \ -s $NAMESERVER_1 53 \ -d $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS -j ACCEPT ipchains -A output -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p udp \ -s $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS \ -d $NAMESERVER_1 53 -j ACCEPT ipchains -A output -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp \ -s $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS \ -d $NAMESERVER_1 53 -j ACCEPT ipchains -A input -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp ! -y \ -s $NAMESERVER_1 53 \ -d $IPADDR $UNPRIVPORTS -j ACCEPT Sorry if this is lengthy. I'm just trying to round up all the evidence. Any clues? Thanks. For now I've restored my resolv.com to look at AT&T's nameservers. ------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net DK KD DKK D Imagine an alternate history where William S. Burroughs was DK KD actually interested in mainframe hardware design. DDDD Bob Bruhin - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |