Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, 12 Oct 2001, Vince McHugh wrote: > > --- Ron Peterson <ron.peterson at yellowbank.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, Vince McHugh wrote: > > > > > 2nd Make Sure you say NO when asked if you want > > large > > > disk support during Win98 setup. This will make > > sure > > > that Win98 is installed on Fat and not Fat32. it > > will > > > also limit the Windows system partion (C:) to 2 > > gigs > > > > I'm not sure why you're advocating FAT over FAT32. > > Either can work. > > Because if you are intendng a tri-boot with NT,as the > subject line indicated, NT won't load into FAT32 and > 9X won't load into NTFS so FAT s commaon ground. Huh? What do you mean by "load into"? You can certainly tri-boot NT/98/Linux using NTFS/FAT32/ext2, so I'm still not quite understanding why you'd want to use FAT. -- -Ron- https://www.yellowbank.com/ - Subcription/unsubscription/info requests: send e-mail with "subscribe", "unsubscribe", or "info" on the first line of the message body to discuss-request at blu.org (Subject line is ignored).
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |