Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
John Chambers wrote: > I've seen it described in a less emotional manner, as an illustration > of an important economic fact: Given a shortage of money, there is > usually a tradeoff between investing in a better product and > investing in a marketing campaign. Microsoft is an illustration of > one of the extremes of this tradeoff. They've shown what can be done > if you don't worry at all about quality, but put all your money into > marketing. Now come on, that's not fair. It's certainly not correct that MSFT doesn't worry at all about quality. Even if we were to presume that none of their products have any "quality," that doesn't mean that they're not worring about it. But Windows e.g. truly has been slowly improving over the years (functionality and stability both). We do know that it's their explicit policy to give implementing new features priority over getting the old ones to work better, but feature set is one component of software "quality." You could certainly argue that they've not achieved maximum software quality (ahem), but we should assess their state fairly. I find it odd that you based this on the presumption of a shortage of money. MSFT has something like $30 billion cash in the bank. They have so much cash they literally don't know where to put it all; excess money has been a problem of theirs for a long time. It is true that (last I looked, which was a while ago now) they put about equal resources ($$, people) into technology and marketing. It seems to work for them; makes me wonder where e.g. Linux/GNU/ open source software would be if there were as many marketeers freely donating their time to promoting and improving it as there are people developing and testing it... peace, --grg
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |