Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On 28 Nov 2001, Seth Gordon wrote: > Oh, one other thing: qmail is not, strictly speaking, open source. > It's distributed in source form, and plenty of folks have published > patches for it, but (a) there's no explicit license distributed with > the code, so in theory, the author could change his mind and tell > everyone they no longer have permission to redistribute it; (b) anyone > who distributes binaries has to base them on the unpatched source > code, without changing anything, including the directories into which > things are installed. That's a good point. Thank you all for your feedback. It sounds like postfix is the way to go for me. I don't need high-throughput, just easier to configure and more secure. JABR, would you be able to bring me the tape of Courtney's postfix presentation on Saturday? If so, Ill wait till I see that. ------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net DK KD DKK D "Democracy is the art and science of running the circus DK KD from the monkey cage." DDDD -H. L. Mencken
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |