Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
on 11/30/01 8:31 PM, David Kramer at david at thekramers.net wrote: > It is against the current terms of service (TOS) agreement to run any kind > of server. They been blocking port 80 on a case-by-case basis. They also > have been removing the DNS entries for some users, so nobody can find your > machine except by IP address. Actually, this blocking of port 80 falls under the Terms of the @HOME agreement. AT&T's own service agreement says that they take no responsibility for users running servers and won't support it, but they do permit it. However, AT&T also says that you may be bound by the terms of other agreements subject to change without notice. This includes the @Home agreement. Now, since @Home is going away, I am *hoping* that the @Home agreement will be dropped entirely and that this no-server clause will not be integrated into AT&T's agreement. Peter
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |