![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I stopped using many of their services also, I found them to be unreliable. However the bandwith is always up, and they have left my services alone. I just do my best not to hog the pipe. Anthony On Sat, 1 Dec 2001, Tim Lyons wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > From: discuss-admin at blu.org [mailto:discuss-admin at blu.org] On Behalf Of > David Kramer > Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 01:33 > To: BLU > Subject: Re: Running Web server on ATT BroadBand > > <SNIP> > > OK, let me get this straight. You are expecting a PHONE COMPANY to > become > MORE REASONABLE? > > There are people on this very list who came to AT&T from MediaOne and > have > port 80 blocked. The names escape me. Maybe it was at a BLU meeting. > > </SNIP> > > Not that I am defending the actions of AT&T during that little crisis > but if you remember, the entire net was getting killed by CodeRed and > it's variants. AT&T took quick steps to block the traffic, and that > included filtering in the hardest hit areas. Personally, I think they > should have d/c'd anyone who ran an unpatched server and not penalized > those who are diligent about server maintenance. > > I have been running public services from my M1/RR/AT&T connection for > almost a year with no blockage or issue. Overall AT&T has been good to > me - but I don't use their services (mail/news/public web), just their > bandwidth. > > Just my .02... > > --Tim > > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |