Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
BSD was NOT fully open source into way after GNU/Linux. people do some research... On Thursday 20 December 2001 12:15 pm, richb at pioneer.ci.net wrote: > GAF wrote: > > They state thet Linux is the first completely open source operating > > system. I think they are wrong on a couple of counts. FreeBSD predates > > Linux, but was kind of overshadowed by the AT&T lawsuit. > > I'm not too sure about that. I brought up Linux in December 1992 and I > don't recall FreeBSD being completely open at that point--you still had to > use some AT&T proprietary code to get it up and running. I chose Linux > over FreeBSD at the time because of that, and because of the active > newsgroups which seemed to have more momentum at the time. FreeBSD's > popularity surged in 1994 or thereabouts. > > > Also, IBM provded OS (both > > MFT and MVT) and VS (VS1 and VS2) in source form in the 70's, and I > > believe that VM370 source was also available free of charge. Of course, > > one needed either a 360 or 370, so it was a bit different. > > In similar fashion, the TOPS-10 source code (in PDP-10 assembly language) > was open to all customers of the $400,000+ series of PDP-10 processors. My > career started out answering SPRs for code-readers at the likes of ADP > (the payroll company) and CNA (the insurance company) and most especially > the various colleges which had these systems. > > The term "open" has been redefined by the movement started by the Free > Software Foundation. The implication these days is that an "open source" > system can be modified and made available to later users, so long as > attribution is given to the original author. Modifications to > proprietary-but-open source code have to be sent back to the original > author, who then makes the decision on making it available. For example, > an embedded-Linux vendor can incorporate new device drivers or > memory-management enhancements without sending them back to Linus, but an > IBM or DEC reseller would have been under licensing restrictions. > > -rich > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- UNIX *IS* user frindly,It is only selective choosing who his friends are. 1110010 1100101 1101011 110010 R E K 2 Unix/Linux system administrator http://www.linuxbusca.com MetroWestBostonLinuxUsertGroup -------------------------------------- "good, updated aplications and good administration! is the key to security not one can live with out the other". by rek2
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |