Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
> Sorry to be so negative: there ARE advantages to having your own setup, not > the least of which is secure web-based mail. It's working fine for me, but I > *still* use the POP server, just so I can turn it off during thunderstorms > or when I'm on vacation, or so my mail doesn't bounce if my server dies. The no-hassle approach to fault tolerance I took with my own email uses circa-1982 technology: good old UUCP. "We don't need no steenkin' POP3 here!" The first MX entry for my domain is the MediaOne-connected server on which I read my mail (locally, using elm, running whatever flavor-of-the-month sendmail rev is most recently recommended by CERT). The second MX entry is a friend's server, one which has a fixed IP address on a Covad DSL line. If my server is sluggish or offline, mail will wind up on the friend's system. Mine is configured to poll that one a few times per hour, using trusty old UUCP-over-TCP. It's a set-and-forget config that can handle IP address changes, provider bankruptcies, sendmail worms, hailstorms--most anything that's been thrown at it over the past 15 years or however long it's been since I first got it working. No plans to change it over the next 15 years either, unless I finally get fed up with updating sendmail three times a year and switch to something else. -rich
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |