Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Remember your DMZ is logically separated. The only thing preventing connections is software... Does your qmail give you any errors, like "unable to resolve MX record for X.com, deferring" or something like that? The fact that nothing comes back in on 53UDP could mean that the mail server's DNS queries go out, but the answers aren't allowed back in. Just a shot, but HTH. --------------- Chuck Young Security Consulting Genuity E-Services -------------------- -----Original Message----- From: discuss-admin at blu.org [mailto:discuss-admin at blu.org]On Behalf Of greenberg at hcfama.org Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:43 AM To: discuss at blu.org Subject: iptables/smtp/dns question Hoping someone can help me clarify a problem I am having setting up a firewall. I want to put our mail server (qmail) behind an iptables-based firewall as part of a dmz. Our LAN uses a separate range of private ips. They are physically segregated running through separate NICs. I tried it out last night. I could send mail from the LAN to the mail server. I could pop mail from the LAN. I could receive mail from the internet. I could not send mail to the internet (the mail did get to the server, but sat in the qmail queue). In retrospect, I am wondering whether the problem was actually DNS-related. We use a DNS server OUTSIDE our network, i.e. on the internet. I was allowing traffic out on port 53 from the mail server, but not allowing it in. Would this have prevented SMTPD from being able to resolve email addresses to ips, and thus queuing the mail on the server? Sorry for being long-winded, just trying to be clear... _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss at blu.org http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |