Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I suppose one thing to also ask is whether or not RAID ought to be considered, especially on a SCSI bus. The current IDE RAID options are sparse at best(unfortunately)given the 3Ware pullout, and SCSI RAID is still a better choice. >[Jerry Feldman: Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:24:58AM -0500] >> SCSI vs. EIDE. >> JABR mentiuoned that it is best to use SCSI if one has a SCSI controller. However, I remember >> seeing recently that IDE (or EIDE) today will give you just as good performance. > >I don't want to bash IDE and the fact that they are a good deal for >the normal desktop.. but to say that they will give you performance >even competitive with scsi is not my experience at all. > >typical scsi throughput is 35MB/s.. cheetah's will do 40.. typicaly >udma/100 IDE performance (if you've got a chipset driver to support >DMA at that rate, which depends on your controller under linux) is >25.. I think the best I've come across is 30.. > >scsi seek times are typically much faster too.. western digital's ide >caviar drives (ata/100) are 8.9ms and their corresponding 7200-spin >scsi drives are 6.9.. that's a 25% difference and in a seek-intensive >space like DB's you see that bigtime. > >> >> Today, IDE drives are still significantly less expensive than SCSI: >> eg. A 7200RPM 100GB EIDE drive is about $175, and the largest SCSI I could find is 73.4GB >> (10,000RPM) for about $465. > >yep.. $/MB is heavy in favor of IDE.. however, lots of times spindles >are just as impt as total MBs.. so you end up buying a fair number of >smaller drives instead of a single big one.. IDE is still cheaper, but >on the smaller drives the differential is a lot less and therefore >going cheap is less tempting.. > >> For a commercial server, I would certainly go SCSI (or possibly firewire...). But for a personal >> system or a home based or even a lightly loaded commercial server, IDE is much more >> economical. > >yep. > >if your limiting factor is network - go ide.. but if parallel load is >your big issue - you'll do a lot more a lot faster with scsi. > >-P >_______________________________________________ >Discuss mailing list >Discuss at blu.org >http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Internet Access by FASTdial.NET at $9.95/mo 56K + DSL In the NorthEast Check out URL http://www.fastdial.net/ or e-mail info at fastdial.net
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |