![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
| I am more comfortable with POSIX shell syntax where | foo > fubar 2>&1 | AFAIK, your syntax should work for the TCSH except maybe don't have a space | between the > and the &. | make test >& test.log & Actually, I didn't type that space. I used >& as usual, and the space comes from the history mechanism. I do use bash occasionally, but I find (t)csh better as an interactive shell. Maybe "better" isn't the right word. I find (t)csh somewhat less frustrating than bash or ksh. It takes fewer tries to get things like loops and history refs right with the csh clones. Csh's if and foreach constructs are somewhat easier to type and get right the first time. (Of course, not everyone types conditionals and for loops to an interactive shell, probably because it ain't easy. I've often been called a showoff for doing such things. ;-)
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |