Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Well said. I'm going to snip it all since the archives are all online. Personally, I've been involved with Unix since about 1980, on PDPs and other systems, most recently Alphas and Itaniums. A business's goal is always the bottom line. So, what a Unix vendor wants to do is to not only provide interoperability and portablility but also to differentiate itself in the marketplace. As PCs became useful as workstations (Linux and FreeBSD) the commercial Unix workstation market started drying up. Who wants to buy a Digital (or Compaq or HP ) Alpha workstation for several thousand when they can get a PC running Linux for several hundred. Today, with virtual machine technology available, you can run both Linux and Windows concurrently on one machine costing under $1000. Linux on the desktop can now provide many of the same tools (same functionality) that you had with Microsoft. Star Office 6.0 at about $60 vs. MS Office at about $300. So, the commercial Unix market is now on the high end where Linux is not yet ready. The major commercial Unixes (Tru64, HP-UX, Solaris, AIX) all scale up in multi-CPU clustering environments with big Oracle databases. But, even Linux is starting to make its way into decent multi-CPU environments (eg. more than 4 CPUs). Vendors, such as HP and IBM are investing very serious $$$$, and those $$$$ are going into Linux. Why Linux and not BSD, I don't really know. Linux got a very big boost when AT&T was suing BSDI, although it AT&T won, it would have shut down Linux and possibly even Minix as well. The popular perception was that FreeBSD might need to be withdrawn, but since Linux had no AT&T code, that they could use Linux legally. Perceptions count more than quality in many cases. Solaris is certainly not the best Unix, but it has the best market share (which they are starting to lose). The other issue is that PC vendors are starting to provide Linux PCs. WalMart for one, but both Dell and HP (Compaq) have also done that in a small way. Microsoft has been able to push Dell and Compaq since both are major Windows vendors also. In any case, in the future, Linux market share is going to continue to grow at the expense of both Windows as well as commercial Unixes. In a few year, AIX, Tru64, and Irix will be things of the past. Windows will continue to host a lions share of the PC market. The only two commercial Unixes will be Solaris and HP-UX (on Itanium). Tru64 and AIX will remain as legacies for at least the next 10 years. On 18 Jun 2002 at 15:44, Bill Bogstad wrote: -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |