Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I'm biased. In truth, I don't like HP-UX. From my experience, True64 is the best of the commercial Unixes (although I have not used AIX). I have used Solaris (both on Sparc and on Intel). I was working for HP at Raytheon a few years ago where I worked on HP-UX on both workstations and large server systems. I also worked on Tru64 Unix (previously Digital Unix previously OSF/1) since before it was released. And I have worked on Ultrix (not very good), FreeBSD, Irix, Xenix(awful typical Microsoft product), Cadmus(pure System V on Motorola 68K), SunOS(the BSD version) and a few others. But, much is a matter of personal preference and opinion. "Jim Long" wrote: > Jerry Feldman wrote: > > Solaris is certainly not the best Unix > > What is the best Unix (in your opinion)? > > > The only two commercial Unixes > > will be Solaris and HP-UX (on Itanium). > > Do you think HP-UX is better? or maybe one of the varieties > that is fading away? What features make it the best? > > Jim Long > -- > __________________________________________________________ > Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com > http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup > > Save up to $160 by signing up for NetZero Platinum Internet service. > http://www.netzero.net/?refcd=N2P0602NEP8 > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss > -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |