Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Thanks for your commets and examples, Jerry. I have no doubt that this is a pointer or memory access problem. I was just going through the debugger (use the DDD front end), and i noticed the backtrace says this: (gdb) bt #0 place_all_nodes (tstruct=0xbffff840, tnode=0x8050d78) at libtab.c:1687 #1 0x0804b779 in tpopulate_from_archive (tstruct=0xbffff840) at libtab.c:1422 #2 0x08049351 in main (argc=4, argv=0xbffff904) at tab.c:189 #3 0x40049507 in __libc_start_main (main=0x8048f80 <main>, argc=4, ubp_av=0xbffff904, init=0x8048b14 <_init>, fini=0x804d6f0 <_fini>, rtld_fini=0x4000dc14 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbffff8fc) at ../sysdeps/generic/libc-start.c:129 (gdb) on #0, there is no address given for the function. This may sound like a dumb questestion, but is this something that i should be worried about? Is there some memory curruptoin that is causing no address to be reported for the current function? Thanks, --brad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |