![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Thanks Nathan. I'm actually no stranger to VMs having used VM370 back in the '70s, and I am a believer of VM technology. Back then we moved from Burroughs MCP to IBM's OS/VS1. I was able to benchmark our payoll system under VM370 in less time than native VS1 (and all that with some online users). But, the real saving grace was with some of our older Burroughts systems. On MCP, when a hardware resource, like a tape drive, is requested, MSP allocates and deallocates it to the task dynamically. On IBM, this is normally done at the JCL level before starting the task (or job step). We had one app that used 5 or 6 tapes during its run, but never more than 3 at the same time. On OS/VS1 were could not run this app native because we did not have enough tape drives. Our solution was to use VM/370, and tell VS1 it had more tape drives than the number of physical drives. Then, when the additional drives were requested, we could then assign the virtual drives to a physical drive. In any case, with a VM, the physical reality and the virtual reality may be quite different. On 22 Jul 2002 at 16:23, Nathan Meyers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 03:45:37PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: > Assuming you license the Linux version, VMWare installs under Linux. > You then run installations of other OSes as "guest operating systems" > under a VMWare process. I am, BTW, a satisfied VMWare user. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |