Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
This could be true for Gateway and other pc-only vendors, but what about vendors such as HPQ and IBM who both manufacture major Unix, proprietary, Linux and Windows boxes. I know there was some language in the contract restricting Compaq to some extent but not prohibiting. If installed Linux had enough market clout, I'm sure that these vendors could easily push back. Again, I'm note sure how the contract reads, but HP is now producing Itanium based systems. On 12 Aug 2002 at 14:42, Kent Borg wrote: > On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 02:00:36PM -0400, Jerry Feldman wrote: > > It's interesting that Dell did not push back. It might be a > > marketing opportunity for HP/Compaq and IBM. Because both of these > > companies produce a large number of Unix and Linux servers, I'm not > > sure if Microsoft can enforce this. > > In the thing I read Dell claims this will apply to competitors too. I > wonder how that works. > > > -kb -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |