![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I have always been a proponent of packages. For the most part, it makes software relatively straightforward to install. We had a package manager at DEC long before Linus went to college.With a package manager you can resolve issue such as: Base OS ships with library X v 4.0. Some compiler package ships with library X v 4.4. OS upgrade ships with library X v 4.2. A good package manager will prevent the OS upgrade from overwriting the newer library. What a package manager cannot do is to resolve problems like incompatiobilities between libraries. Once you go beyong the package manager and build from source, you are on your own. On 12 Aug 2002 at 15:33, Chris Tresco wrote: > I've never thought of package management as a bottleneck. Quite the > contrary. -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |