![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
I still think GNU/Linux is GNU/Linux. and the kernel is Linux even in the Linux Kernel mailing list FAQ is pointed like that. and I have a lot of opinions about the reason why some people don't like to called that way, but I won't say cause I wont make friends.. LOL The point is nobody here is going to convince no one of what is right or wrong, when I started the first email I advised with (rant) and always pointed "my opinion" I just hope everyone else will do the same thing for two reasons: 1 first type rant in the topic for those that have no interest on a rant topic 2 to write that is your opinion is way better than actually make statements of a issue that nobody have never won(any side) is like emacs or vi... cause 4 corporations have decided to call gnu/Linux as Linux don't means that the whole community is doing so. and the community is what is all about( at least I think 5 years a go before we became business ) and things got screw up. so please don't start a flame of a GNU against Linux war (not saying that we are actually doing it, but is going that way.) ReK2 On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 17:45, Rob Ransbottom wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Derek D. Martin wrote: > > At some point hitherto, Rob Ransbottom hath spake thusly: > > > something else. I've been using Linux since 1995, have used both > > Oh, a newbie. > > > > I don't doubt rms' arguments were spurious, that does not de-legitimize > > > the request itself. > > > How does it not? The vendors name their products; that is their > > right. Even in the world of printed text, the producer of a > > What you say is true enough, but is not responsive to the statement I > made. > > That rms requests anyone distributing current linux distros to publicly > & obviously credit GNU is not unreasonable. > That he can be obnoxious, etc., is beside the point, except that it > will turn people away. It is not has if SUSE/Redhat/Caldera/Mandrake/etc > were going to agree if he was pleasant or smooth. rms' world has > been less friendly than Linus'. > > > What exactly makes them GNU/Linux? The fact that they include a fair > > amount of (OPTIONAL) GNU application software that may or may not ever > > be installed by the user? It's true that there is a large amount of > > GNU software shipped with a Linux system; almost none of which is > > actually required to be installed for the system to be useful. This > > Try stripping a system of GNU stuff, then tell me how well it runs and > what you actually used it for. > > > software was compiled with gcc, but if I were to use a Windows system > > with a MyCo web browser and MyCo office suite that was compiled by > > Borland C/C++ compiler, does that make it Borland/Windows? > > Not the same issue. Though Microsoft officially said that the browser > was a core element of the OS. :-) > > > attempt to heal it. Frankly, I find it repugnant, and in some ways > > directly counter to some of the ideas that he is trying to publicize > > in so doing. Part of the reason that Linus has remained in the > > spotlight for so long, IMO, is precisely because he was always the > > timid but likable geek who was much more interested in writing good > > code for people to use, than in getting the credit for it... > > I agree. But it is easy to be uninterested in credit when you > are flooded with it. You yourself might be happy to code for > 150 an hour until you see the neighboring bozo, that you've been > helping, is getting 1000. > > > I AM a free software partisan, and support many of the philosophies > > espoused by rms, albeit to a lesser degree. Nevertheless, his > > Well I agree with some also, but I don't count myself a partisan. > The FSF is about free as in price not about freedom, and the license > reflects a generous and paranoid mentality. > > Gee, you've agreed with all the points I was trying to make in > that post. You also disagreed with some too. Maybe I didn't > express myself too well. Or more likely rms is even more > abrasive than I think, that would color my response were I thou. > > > rob Live the dream. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss -- 1110010 1100101 1101011 110010 REK2 Unix/Linux system administrator MetroWestBoston LUG http://rek2.linuxbusca.com http://www.linuxbusca.com
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |