![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
[Robert La Ferla: Aug 29 21:18] > Has anyone tried out the beta 2.5 kernels? How stable are they? What > does 2.5 offer over 2.4? Is it worth trying??? > 2.5 are development kernels - not beta kernels. There is a gigantic difference. 2.4.20-preX, now that's a beta kernel. IDE is massively dangerous - read weekly lwn.net for a bit of flavor.. lots of basic stuff is broken; for example floppy support. there are lots of new toys however.. my personal favs are futexes (which will allow much more efficient mutex coordination and therefore reasonable thread scaling), NAPI (the new network driver API that supports interrupt mitigation and thus NICs that behave much better under load as well prevention of some SMP induced packet reordering that is common on 2.4), and the block layer rewrite (which has significantly improved the performance of an app I have that does lots of DIRECT disk writes.. things like oracle will benefit greatly.) ymmv. -P
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |