Minicom and windows

[gaf at blu.org (Jerry Feldman)]

it certainly does. 
John Abreau wrote:


> Last time I looked at PuTTY (admittedly a long time ago), it only supported
> ssh1, and not ssh2. A huge security hole exists in ssh1's fundamental 
> design,
> and many sites, including ours, disable the ssh1 protocol entirely.
> 
> Does PuTTY support ssh2 now?
> 
> 
> -- 
> John Abreau / Executive Director, Boston Linux & Unix 
> ICQ 28611923 / AIM abreauj / YAHOO abreauj
> Email jabr at blu.org / WWW http://www.abreau.net / PGP-Key-ID 0xD5C7B5D9
> PGP-Key-Fingerprint 72 FB 39 4F 3C 3B D6 5B E0 C8 5A 6E F1 2C BE 99
> 
>    Some people say, "The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
>    I often respond, "When elephants fight, it's the grass
>    that gets trampled."
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --==_Exmh_673796070P
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Exmh version 2.5 01/15/2001
> 
> iQCVAwUBPYJwslV9A5rVx7XZAQJruAP/Vr44H3BWciFt+GnfkO6MGHehhZkxNOoI
> AKY+O9T3TXMNcIB0+fNjPHsNtKRzLLRzW7V9UtqcptWNxtglZh+PtixM1YzlviPW
> yAaoQzzQF3dz1ZPB/8SCCCe/ue3yYcymtHPlniJFP+a3E6HPGALMVztKXDpLhJzG
> j9/WWy/oAQY=
> =xlpV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --==_Exmh_673796070P--
> 

-- 
Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org>
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9
PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9