Home | Calendar | Mail Lists | List Archives | Desktop SIG | Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings
Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU

BLU Discuss list archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Mandrake vs. Red Hat

Subject: Mandrake vs. Red Hat
From: nmeyers at javalinux.net (Nathan Meyers)
Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 10:43:27 -0400
In-reply-to: <20020919103525.B27462@borg.org>
References: <20020919103525.B27462@borg.org>

On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 10:35:25AM -0400, Kent Borg wrote:
> I've got a question: Which is better, Mandrake or Red Hat?  Why?

They're both first-rate, and Mandrake is based on RH anyway. Mandrake
delivers Pentium-optimized executables for somewhat better performance,
and tends to have better hardware detection and setup.

Nathan Meyers
nmeyers at javalinux.net

References:
- Mandrake vs. Red Hat
  - From: kentborg at borg.org (Kent Borg)

Prev by Date: Mandrake vs. Red Hat
Next by Date: Mandrake vs. Red Hat
Previous by thread: Mandrake vs. Red Hat
Next by thread: Mandrake vs. Red Hat
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Boston Linux & Unix / webmaster@blu.org