Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
"Bill Horne" <bill at horne.net> writes: > I'm still puzzled: this was a new entry, with no previous information. Since > any previous lookups would have failed, what was there to cache? DNS caches NXDOMAIN (negative results), too. The point of caching is to reduce the load on the authoritative server. DNS information is assumed to be quazi-static (and when it is not, you can lower the TTL -- time to live -- to inform the caches how long they should keep the data). If negative information were not cached, then you would boink a server every time you requested the (same) non-existent domain name. That would sort of reduce the effectiveness of having a cache, wouldn't it? > Bill -derek -- Derek Atkins Computer and Internet Security Consultant derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |