![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:51:20PM -0400, David Kramer wrote: [snip] > So I guess we won't be able to easily upgrade from 7.3 to 8.0. I spent way > too much time getting my server right to start from e2fsck again. Don't see why you couldn't upgrade from 7.3 to 8.0. As long as your not doing it piecemeal and are using the actual installer, everything will be upgraded together from the boot media and should work fine. Upgrades are definitely a part of the testing process and are supported (though, I don't know how far back it goes -- used to be as far back as 2.0 for Red Hat, but I don't think that's the case anymore ;-)). Where you *could* run into problems is if you've added custom software not part of the distribution. You may just have to recompile with gcc 3.2 after the upgrade to get things working again. Not sure what you mean by 'e2fsck again', as that has little (if anything) to do with gcc and glibc upgrades. I general distrust all upgrades, anyhow. At the very least, I duplicate my existing install and make sure I can boot from it. Then I do the upgrade on the original install and if something disastrous happens, I just boot from the copy I made and see what I can fix, or revert back to the old release and plan a clean install, migrating my customizations over to the new release. A pain, yes, but I've been burned too often by in the past (though, not so much lately, interestingly enough) by upgrades. -- -Paul Iadonisi Senior System Administrator Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist Ever see a penguin fly? -- Try Linux. GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets
![]() |
|
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |