Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Redhat has being distributing a linux-enterprise kernel for some time now, which includes things like large file ad memory support. If memory servers, even RH6.2 had an enterprise kernel. "Mark J. Dulcey" wrote: > John Abreau wrote: > > "Mark J. Dulcey" <mark at buttery.org> writes: > > > > > >>First, you have to use a file system that supports larger files. > >>ext2 and ext3 have a file size limit of 2GB, so even if you got your > >>code to compile, it wouldn't help. > > > > > > I've found that on RedHat 7.3 (I haven't checked on older releases) > > the 2 GB limit exists for ext2, but not ext3. I've had video files > > choke at 2 GB on an ext2 volume, and after running tune2fs -j /dev/hdd1 > > and remounting the volume as ext3, I've successfully written video files > > up to 7 GB long. > > Interesting. Nothing I have read about ext3 led me to believe that it would h > andle larger files, and I haven't had occasion to try it myself. It's nice to > know that there is another option. People running Red Hat (where ext3 is now > the native filesystem) will be especially pleased; it's not as big a deal fo > r SuSE fans, where ReiserFS is now the default. > > The original question was about Red Hat 7.1, which didn't even include ext3 s > upport; ext3 made its first appearance in 7.2. At the very least, you would n > eed a newer kernel to use it with 7.1, and you would really want newer versio > ns of the ext2 utilities (the new ones that support ext3) as well. > > _______________________________________________ > Discuss mailing list > Discuss at blu.org > http://www.blu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss >
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |