Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Blog | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Actually, I disagree with this. Windows 9x as an OS is inherently insecure. Windoiws 2K and forward are better in that respect. But, IMHO, I prefer a separate firewall. Gives the hackers a bit more work to do :-) On 24 Oct 2002 at 12:31, Chris Tresco wrote: > You could argue the same for a Windows box... if maintained correctly , > it doesn't need a firewall. But alas... -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |