Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Ah, yes. The perennial question. I stayed out the last time someone posted this question to the list, but I can't hold back anymore. I like Mandrake. But I didn't have any basis for comparison, which is why I bowed out before. And I just ran across several reviews... But before I quote them, there are two items I do have personal experience with. - Mandrake has supermount for removable media. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the other distro's haven't adopted it. It's a little thing, but makes my computer more friendly. - Red Hat has had a habit of releasing code before it's ready for prime time. I use Linux commerically, and just don't have time for it. There was the fiasco with the 2.96 gcc compiler. And as soon as Gnome could compile, it was installed as the default desktop. But the Gnome folks had decided to re-write anything that wasn't GPL'd, and they made mistakes and omissions. I found that they had re-written xdm, but forgot to install all the standard entrys in .Xauthority, so I couldn't run X applications remotely. That's when I switched to Mandrake. - Mandrake has included more window managers, filesystems, and applications (e.g., xemacs) than other distro's. I found these notes on www.extremetech.com, who, in the end, rate Mandrake a 9 (10 is highest), RedHat an 8, and SUSE a 7. "Mandrake, Red Hat, and SuSE each have complete Control Centers. I personally find that Mandrake does the best job of simplifying and streamlining the way that their tools are used during installation. Mandrake's daily administration tools are organized in categories, (such as networks, printers, etc.). SuSE organizes their tools very well for day-to-day administration, categorizing and organizing each set of features together. SuSE keeps the same organization and displays an almost identical Control Center to configure the system during installation. While this is great for consistency, I believe it puts too much burden on an inexperienced software installer." "SuSE also needs work with the overall GNOME setup. SuSE is easy to install, includes a great disk resizing wizard, is easy to set up, has a lot of useful software, and very good documentation. But it's just not as good as the others." I stand ready to be flamed.
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |