Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wednesday 20 November 2002 10:17 am, John Chambers wrote: > | These things are best done with the GUI (that's its purpose). The file > | was not designed with hand-editing in mind. > > This is, of course, a nonsequitur. If A is better than B at a job, > the fact that B was designed to do the job isn't really relevant. A > is still better. Yes it is. The KDE folk did leave the file in a flat ascii text format so that you can editit if you like. I believe it is an ini style file. Here's a good description of it from openbsd's man page of isakmpd.conf(5) "The file is of a well known type of format called .INI style, named after the suffix used by an overrated windowing environment for its configura- tion files." The overrated windowing env is Windows, not KDE. > Also, it's very rare that the interactive config tools include all > the config options. This is because the developers don't use such a > tool much, since it doesn't work well in their semi-functional > development situation. It is actaully the case here. Since this options are simple (just a list of key-value pairs), creating a gui which can handle all options is possible. > If KDE really can't be configured by editing its config files, that > is a serious argument against it. What do you do when you bollix up > the configuration, and as a result, the GUI config tool is a zombie? It can be. There's just necessary warning attached with doing it :). There are certain options which are supported and options that will work, but are not supported. (supported meaning if a bug is filed they will look at it) You may (or may not) be suprised how many people edit a config file and file bug becuase it was something that they hand edited. Anyhow, i understand your point. > | I would highly recommend not editing this > | file by hand. If you intend to deploy these key binding to a large number > | of workstations, configure using the GUI and copy the necessary file, > | which is ~/.kde/share/config/kdeglobals. > | > | That being said, the file is ~/.kde/share/config/kdeglobals, so go nuts. > > It would be interesting to know how reasonable it is to do this. > Also, on this workstation, I don't seem to have such a file, although > the ~/.kde/share/config/ is populated. Maybe it's using a default > file somewhere that I don't know about? I would take a guess that the defaults are hard-coded, so that if the config file doesn't exist the env can still operate. Perhaps you can try to change a keybinding and see if the file gets created or not. By, they way, there are two locations to look for kde config files ~/.kde/share/config ant $KDEDIR/share/config. -brad
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |