 |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
|
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
Surprise news from a study sponsored by Microsoft - a Win2K server is
cheaper to run than a Linux server... if you plug enough assumptions
into the model:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/28408.html
(One of those assumptions is that the Win2K customer never buys any
upgrades from Microsoft. Someday Microsoft is going to actually read
the crap it publishes and die of embarrassment.)
Nathan Meyers
nmeyers at javalinux.net
