| Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | About BLU |
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 11:06 pm, Jerry Feldman wrote:
> This is true. Hp, Digital/Compaq/HP, and IBM have invested a lot of money
> into the scaling of their commercial Unixes on large multi-CPU systems.
> AFAIk, Linux does not scale well above something like 4 processors.
>
> David Kramer wrote:
> > At a panel today, an IBM head said exactly that. Essentially, for
> > applicaitons that need to run on one box with lots of processors and lots
> > of RAM, AIX is still their solution. For applicaitons that can be split
> > up and run on a cluster, Linux is better.
Speakers today were talking about Linux scaling well to 8 processors today,
and the next major kernel scaling up to 12 due to code IBM is folding back
into it from their own work.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net
DK KD "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of
DKK D Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine
DK KD wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not
DDDD able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that
could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage