![]() |
Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 11:06 pm, Jerry Feldman wrote: > This is true. Hp, Digital/Compaq/HP, and IBM have invested a lot of money > into the scaling of their commercial Unixes on large multi-CPU systems. > AFAIk, Linux does not scale well above something like 4 processors. > > David Kramer wrote: > > At a panel today, an IBM head said exactly that. Essentially, for > > applicaitons that need to run on one box with lots of processors and lots > > of RAM, AIX is still their solution. For applicaitons that can be split > > up and run on a cluster, Linux is better. Speakers today were talking about Linux scaling well to 8 processors today, and the next major kernel scaling up to 12 due to code IBM is folding back into it from their own work. ------------------------------------------------------------------- DDDD David Kramer http://thekramers.net DK KD "On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of DKK D Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine DK KD wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not DDDD able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." -- Charles Babbage