Home
| Calendar
| Mail Lists
| List Archives
| Desktop SIG
| Hardware Hacking SIG
Wiki | Flickr | PicasaWeb | Video | Maps & Directions | Installfests | Keysignings Linux Cafe | Meeting Notes | Linux Links | Bling | About BLU |
Thanks for the explanation Derek. Derek Atkins wrote: > Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> writes: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > > > When I digitally sign a message, my choices are: > > none, clearsign, standard, and plus encrypt. > > When I use standard setting, then entire message is encrypted (essentially > > the same as plus encrypt. > > I'm using exmh 2.5. > > I was wondering if anyone else using exmh has the same properties. > > It's not encrypted, it is just signed.. Anyone with PGP can read > the message. "Standard Signature" just means "sign the message > and then use Ascii-Armor to protect the whole thing". > > It's just a base-64 encoded copy of your plaintext message. > > -derek, co-author of PGP. > > -- > Derek Atkins > Computer and Internet Security Consultant > derek at ihtfp.com www.ihtfp.com > -- Jerry Feldman <gaf at blu.org> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9
BLU is a member of BostonUserGroups | |
We also thank MIT for the use of their facilities. |